![]() ![]() Chris Kapenga of Waukesha County praised the court's decision. Lawmakers were split on the issue, largely along party lines. Instead, the court wrote that they "trust that the Legislature and Palm have placed the interest of the people of Wisconsin first and have been working together in good faith." For that reason, the court struck down the Safer At Home order in full, and are now leaving it up to lawmakers and the DHS to come up with something different. We perceive this request as being grounded in a concern for an orderly transition from to a lawful rule," the court wrote in their majority opinion. "Although a very unusual request, on April 21, 2020, the Legislature asked this court to issue a temporary injunction of but then requested a stay of that injunction for at least six days. The Wisconsin Supreme Court didn't see it that way. Republican lawmakers in their lawsuit sought a six-day reprieve from the Stay At Home order - enough time, they thought, to craft and implement a new order moving forward. In their lawsuit, Republican state legislators claimed that an "un-elected, unconfirmed cabinet secretary laid claim to a suite of czar-like powers-unlimited in scope and indefinite in duration-over the people of Wisconsin." Prior to the lawsuit, Evers directed State Department of Health Services Secretary Andrea Palm to extend the order from April 24 to May 27. After months of unproductive posturing, I hope the folks in the Legislature are ready to do the same,” Evers wrote. I am disappointed in the decision today, but our top priority has been and will remain doing what we can and what we have to do to protect the health and safety of the people of our state. “This virus has killed more than 400 of our family members, friends, and neighbors and thousands more across our state are sick. In the meantime, Evers wrote, he's hoping state lawmakers can put together a good enough plan moving forward. Evers said Wednesday night's ruling was a setback, but that if Wisconsin residents continue to act with public health and safety in mind, the state can persevere through the pandemic. Now that the decision has been rendered, we are confident Wisconsin citizens are up to the task of fighting the virus as we enter a new phase," Vos wrote. He politely declined and said we should wait for the court decision. "When we met with Governor Evers a week ago, we asked him to begin negotiating with us on a plan for reopening. In the majority opinion issued Wednesday night, the State Supreme Court stated that Department of Health Services Secretary Andrea Palm did not follow the law in creating the Safer At Home Order, and as a result, there can be no criminal penalties for violations of her order.Īssembly Speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester) was an ardent backer of the lawsuit, and said Wednesday night that he's looking to come up with a new plan for opening the state back up in the midst of the coronavirus pandemic. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |